On 45th Apollo Anniversary, Author Says Too Few People Are Dying In Space - WAFF-TV: News, Weather and Sports for Huntsville, AL

On 45th Apollo Anniversary, Author Says Too Few People Are Dying In Space

Information contained on this page is provided by an independent third-party content provider. WorldNow and this Station make no warranties or representations in connection therewith. If you have any questions or comments about this page please contact pressreleases@worldnow.com.

SOURCE Interglobal Media LLC

Irrational Risk Aversion Holds Us Back In Human Spaceflight

WASHINGTON, July 16, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- On the 45th anniversary of the first flight to land humans on the moon, a new book explains why we haven't been back there or anywhere beyond earth orbit in over four decades, and why we are dependent on Russia for access to our own space station.

Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20140715/127429

"Since the end of Apollo, space hasn't been considered important enough to risk human life. The House recently passed a NASA authorization bill that said 'safety is the highest priority.' That means that everything else, including actual spaceflight, is a lower one. We're apparently willing to spend billions on it, but that's for jobs, not actual progress in space," says Rand Simberg, author of the new book, Safe Is Not An Option: Overcoming The Futile Obsession With Getting Everyone Back Alive That Is Killing Our Expansion Into Space.

"Despite the fact that, to get our astronauts to ISS, we have to send millions of taxpayer dollars to Russia, which continues to act against our national interests, there seems to be no hurry to end our dependence on them. It's apparently more important to Congress to not possibly lose an astronaut than to regain control of our own space destiny. Congress underfunds Commercial Crew and insists that NASA continue to develop it the old, expensive slow way that killed fourteen astronauts anyway, in the name of 'safety.'"

He points out that had we taken this safety obsession as seriously in the 1960s, we wouldn't have sent astronauts around the moon in 1968, when we won the space race, let alone landing them in 1969. "Buzz and Neil thought they had maybe a 50-50 chance of success, but they went, because it was important," Simberg says. "If I were an astronaut today, I'd be outraged at Congress, that thinks I don't have 'the right stuff' to support my country in space, or that what I'm doing is so trivial it's not worth the risk."

The book notes that space is the harshest frontier that humanity has ever faced in its history, and it is unrealistic to think that it will be opened for development and settlement without the loss of human life, any more than any previous one was. Simberg elaborates, "I'm not saying that we should be trying to kill people in space, or be reckless, any more than I like to see people die on the highways. But the only way to not have people die in space is to not send them. We should be doing so much there that deaths are just as inevitable as they are in any other human endeavor."

The book (ISBN: 978-0-9891355) is available at Barnes & Noble and Amazon, in print and electronic form, and the author is available for media interviews via the publisher, Interglobal Media LLC.

Contact: Sarah Abernathy

©2012 PR Newswire. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by WorldNow

1414 North Memorial Parkway
Huntsville, AL 35801

WAFF Is a Proud Member
of the Raycom Family of Stations

FCC Public File
EEO Report
Closed Captioning

All content © Copyright 2000 - 2014 Worldnow and WAFF. All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.